IGA’s Darren Herman blogs about the recent OMMA panel on advergaming, calling it a farce. Hard to disagree. While advergaming has clear advantages in certain situations for certain demographics, I don’t see how you can make a sweeping argument in favor of advergaming over in-game advertising (or the other way around).
On this blog we bring together the latest insights in the cross-over of business and gaming - from gamevertising to businessgames.
To find out more about Futurelab: Click here
Authors
Blogs we read
- Avant Game
- Serious Games Source
- Game Research
- Advertising Lab
- Raph’s Website
- Henry Jenkins
- the-inbetween.com
- Joystick101
- GameSetWatch
- Kotaku
- Marketing & Strategy Innovation Blog
- Business Communicators of Second Life
- Destructoid
- Adverblog
- We the Sheeple
- The Daedalus Project
- GamePolitics.com
- Future-Making Serious Games
- Serious Games Portal
- Darren Herman
- Water Cooler Games
- Clickable Culture
- reBang
- Terra Nova
- SLOG
- 3pointD
- ARGNet
- iViNNie
« NY Times: Selling to Avatars | Main | Lead Users, Lego, Must and Can »
Opinion: OMMA Advergame Panelists Biased
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.futurelab.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1328
Search
Categories
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
Leave a comment